Евразийский юридический журнал > DOI > REDUCTION OF THE PENALTY IN CIVIL CASES ARISING FROM A DISPUTE BETWEEN A PATIENT AND A PLASTIC SURGERY CLINIC (ARTICLE 333 OF THE CIVIL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, RESOLUTION OF THE PLENUM OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION № 17 OF 06/28/2012, PARAGRAPH 34; RESOLUTION OF THE PLENUM OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION OF MARCH 24, 2016 № 7)
REDUCTION OF THE PENALTY IN CIVIL CASES ARISING FROM A DISPUTE BETWEEN A PATIENT AND A PLASTIC SURGERY CLINIC (ARTICLE 333 OF THE CIVIL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, RESOLUTION OF THE PLENUM OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION № 17 OF 06/28/2012, PARAGRAPH 34; RESOLUTION OF THE PLENUM OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION OF MARCH 24, 2016 № 7)
от

REDUCTION OF THE PENALTY IN CIVIL CASES ARISING FROM A DISPUTE BETWEEN A PATIENT AND A PLASTIC SURGERY CLINIC (ARTICLE 333 OF THE CIVIL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, RESOLUTION OF THE PLENUM OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION № 17 OF 06/28/2012, PARAGRAPH 34; RESOLUTION OF THE PLENUM OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION OF MARCH 24, 2016 № 7)

№ 6 (205) 2025

DOI 10.46320/2073-4506-2025-6-205-231-233

Pages 231-233

YASTREMSKIY Ivan Anatoljevich
lawyer, NGO of the Leningrad Regional Bar Association, Pelevin and Partners Law Firm branch

REDUCTION OF THE PENALTY IN CIVIL CASES ARISING FROM A DISPUTE BETWEEN A PATIENT AND A PLASTIC SURGERY CLINIC (ARTICLE 333 OF THE CIVIL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, RESOLUTION OF THE PLENUM OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION № 17 OF 06/28/2012, PARAGRAPH 34; RESOLUTION OF THE PLENUM OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION OF MARCH 24, 2016 № 7)

The article reveals the nature of the penalty, the grounds for reducing its size by a court in civil cases arising from a dispute between a patient and a plastic surgery clinic. The value of the penalty in cases involving consumers is justified. Attention is drawn to the inadmissibility of arbitrary reduction of the penalty by the court. The provisions on the penalty in German legislation are investigated.

Keywords: penalty, reduction, reduction, consumer, court, clinic, contract, obligation, responsibility.

№ 6 (205) 2025

Страницы 231-233

ЯСТРЕМСКИЙ Иван Анатольевич
адвокат, ННО Ленинградской областной коллегии адвокатов, филиал Адвокатская контора «Пелевин и партнеры»

СНИЖЕНИЕ НЕУСТОЙКИ ПО ГРАЖДАНСКИМ ДЕЛАМ, ВЫТЕКАЮЩИМ ИЗ СПОРА ПАЦИЕНТА С КЛИНИКОЙ ПЛАСТИЧЕСКОЙ ХИРУРГИИ (СТ. 333 ГК РФ, ПОСТАНОВЛЕНИЕ ПЛЕНУМА ВС РФ № 17 ОТ 28.06.2012, П. 34; ПОСТАНОВЛЕНИЕ ПЛЕНУМА ВС РФ ОТ 24 МАРТА 2016 Г. № 7)

В статье раскрыты природа неустойки, основания уменьшения ее размера судом по гражданским делам, вытекающим из спора пациента с клиникой пластической хирургии. Обосновано значение неустойки в делах с участием потребителей. Обращено внимание на недопустимость произвольного снижения судом неустойки. Исследованы положения о неустойке в немецком законодательстве.

Ключевые слова: неустойка, уменьшение, снижение, потребитель, суд, клиника пластической хирургии, договор, обязательство, ответственность.

 9 ВСЕГО,  3 СЕГОДНЯ